In a significant turn of events at the Ogun Election Petition tribunal today, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) surprised attendees by choosing not to call any witnesses to defend its actions. Instead, the commission opted to rest its case solely on the points raised by the Petitioner, Ladi Adebutu of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), and his legal team.
As the tribunal convened, respondents began presenting their opening defenses, marking a crucial phase in the ongoing electoral dispute.
The courtroom was abuzz with anticipation as the panel convened for another session of the Ogun Election Petition tribunal.
The atmosphere was charged with the weight of the case, which holds significant implications for the state’s political landscape.With the case file prominently displayed, the stage was set for the day’s proceedings.
The eyes of the nation were on the courtroom as the legal teams geared up for a critical phase of the dispute.The legal battleground featured prominent representatives from both sides. Sikirullah Ogundele stood for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), while James Dina represented the All Progressives Congress (APC), underlining the high stakes of the case.1st Respondent: Olumuyiwa Baruwa and A.O. Ati John took the lead in presenting the defense for the first respondent, showcasing a robust legal team ready to address the allegations.2nd Respondent: Professor Taiwo Osipitan SAN and Titilola Akinlawon SAN led the defense for the second respondent, alongside a team of experienced legal minds prepared to counter the petitioner’s claims.3rd Respondent: Tayo Oyetubo SAN, Olubukonla Ojuri Esq, Bashir Oladipupo Esq, D.D Owoeye Esq, James Adeloye Esq, R.A. Fatoye Esq, Aina Odetayo Esq, and A.M. Odubela Esq represented the third respondent, demonstrating a united front against the allegations.Petitioner’s Appearance:Gordy Uche SAN, Olumuyiwa Obanewa, Chiamaka Esq, Olakunle Lawal Esq, Mike Uche Esq, and Chinaza Esq presented the petitioner’s case, underscoring their determination to present a compelling argument.
A moment of intrigue unfolded as INEC’s counsel stepped forward. In an unexpected twist, INEC announced its decision not to call any witnesses, preferring to rest its case entirely on the matter raised by the petitioner. Laughter rippled through the courtroom as all parties, including the respondents and the petitioner, offered no The courtroom’s response was one of astonishment, with observers taken aback by INEC’s choice.
The decision created an atmosphere of heightened curiosity as to the commission’s strategy and the implications it might carry.
As the tribunal adjourned for the day following INEC’s unexpected announcement, the focus shifted to the upcoming presentations of the respondents’ opening defences.
The stage is now set for a rigorous legal battle that will determine the outcome of the Ogun Election Petition, with the absence of INEC’s witnesses adding an intriguing layer to the unfolding proceedings.